From 421546d23d86434190caa9bb301e5cb7e96d4889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Austein Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:24:15 +0000 Subject: Add an initial set of rpkidb models and confirm that Django is willing to parse them and generate migrations for them. Not actually using them for anything yet, but code still runs with this present so haven't broken anything yet.... svn path=/branches/tk705/; revision=6103 --- rpki/fields.py | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'rpki/fields.py') diff --git a/rpki/fields.py b/rpki/fields.py index dab6ce14..d1025c35 100644 --- a/rpki/fields.py +++ b/rpki/fields.py @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ class BlobField(models.Field): guidelines than actual rules. But "BLOB" works. For anything else, we just use "BLOB" and hope for the best. + + NB: This field type predates Django 1.6's BinaryField. Probably + this should be retired in favor of BinaryField, but I'd have to + figure out what that does to field types that derive from this one. """ __metaclass__ = models.SubfieldBase -- cgit v1.2.3