Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
There would (probably) be no security issue with continuing to use
OpenSSL 1.0.2h for RPKI, but it's usually best to stay current.
Update the update-snapshot script to use git instead of svn.
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6423
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6350
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6212
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6075
|
|
http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6069
|
|
Most of the vulnerabilities fixed are in TLS and DTLS code we don't
use, and all of them are minor, see OpenSSL release notes if you care.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=6046
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5999
|
|
staying current.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5975
|
|
affect anything the RPKI code does, but it's easiest to stay current.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5861
|
|
easier to upgrade than to answer that question even once.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5767
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5619
|
|
absence of which seems to be confusing "make" for one user. See #586.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5444
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=5190
|
|
svn path=/branches/tk377/; revision=4974
|
|
automate construction of things like the pkg-plist for a FreeBSD port.
This is a fairly nasty kludge, but we're kind of trapped at the
intersection of two different build systems (autoconf and disttools)
and a laundry list of platform-specific packaging systems, so anything
we do here is likely to be nasty, and almost anything is better than
trying to maintain packing lists for all those systems by hand.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4938
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4436
|
|
because it goes looking for a non-existent "makedepend" program. As
far as I can tell, everything works fine if we just ignore the failure
and press on with the OpenSSL build, so we now do that. Sigh.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4396
|
|
to CMS when used for encryption, so I don't think it's a serious issue
for RPKI CMS signed data, but upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0h anyway.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4395
|
|
svn path=/trunk/; revision=4141
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3970
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3899
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3794
|
|
Shared library control is [no-]shared, not {enable,disable}-shared;
fortunately the default seems to be shared on platforms where it
matters, which is why nobody noticed the error.
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3716
|
|
svn path=/Makefile.in; revision=3628
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3618
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3617
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3615
|
|
because we do need position independent code to build _POW.so.
svn path=/configure; revision=3603
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3602
|
|
svn path=/Makefile.in; revision=3596
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3586
|
|
svn path=/configure; revision=3584
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3562
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3295
|
|
svn path=/openssl/Makefile.in; revision=3161
|
|
only using it where absolutely necessary at the moment.
svn path=/Makefile; revision=3125
|